Saturday, August 2nd, 2008...4:14 am
The North-west Metro
… or SydLink, as its been branded, is — let’s face it — bad. Sydney desperately needed new public transport investment and this was the least costly solution with the biggest political impact.
Whatever heavy transport solution was proposed needed to cross Sydney Harbour, as the existing path across the Bridge is at maximum capacity. Instead of going with a new tunnel under the harbour, north of the CBD, the state government decided to cross at Drummoyne and Gladesville, which is cheaper, but ends up with St. James as the interchange station.
What are the political reasons why Metro is the preferred solution? Well, it bypasses the Rail unions, RailCorp and various other organs in the NSW rail Frankenstein. That itself probably sealed the deal for cabinet. The metro carriages are also single-deck, meaning that the tunnels that need to be carved out are smaller — another significant cost saving.
But why are Metro carriages only single deckers? Because they are mass transit systems designed to carry lots of standing passengers, for short distances, and allow for rapid boarding and alighting. A continuous stretch of 38 kilometres is not Blind Date hd
a short distance. That kind of a commute calls for a heavy rail route.
Now, had the government proposed a Metro system for inner Sydney, that would have made sense all round. The inner west, City of Sydney and satellites have high population densities, higher reliance on public transport, and a strong interconnectedness. A Metro loop would actually have guaranteed patronage and be economically useful. It would also divert passengers from the choked CityRail network.
Relieving the core of the CityRail network would then allow the government to continue with its past plans for a new harbour rail crossing, a line from Epping to the Hills district, and completion of the Parramatta – Epping link, which was permanently put on ice. That would be a mass transit network worth having.
John Watkins likes to talk of building capacity
, but that is not what the Metro is about. It is about playing catch-up in a region where there is virtually no access to good public transport, and where the motor vehicle reigns supreme. Given the prominence of climate change as the cause du jour Ali Baba Goes to Town full movie
, governments should not be afraid to spend big on this kind of infrastructure. What is the point of a AAA credit rating if you’re not going to use it?
1 Comment
August 12th, 2008 at 4:35 pm
What next? Let’s build tree lined boulevardes for getting to Blacktown, and plonk down freeway overpasses on the harbour front.
Hmm, I just realised we already have one of those. It’s called the Cahill Expressway.
Leave a Reply