Monday, October 22nd, 2007...4:25 am
A not-so-great economic debate
A most interesting thing happened in the “Great” Debate between Howard and Rudd. They both tripped over themselves to lay claim to being the natural successors of the Hawke/Keating legacy of reform and management, though Howard characteristically tried to have a two-bob each way by continuing to excoriate them for “the 17 per cent interest rates we had to have”, and rabbiting the laughable fallacy that Liberals=budget surplus and Labor=budget deficit. Look to your own record Prime Minister.
Interesting because over the last decade the Howard government has blamed every piece of bad news on the previous administration, with the ultimate economic dilettante Captain Eager and the Mark of Voth movie A Sex, Liesnd Videotape rip
leading the charge. Labor, under its various leaders ran scared from this legacy, believing the Keating brand to be politically toxic. There was no reason why this should have been so. The financial and tariff deregulation, National Competition Policy, Prices and Incomes Accords of the era, along with industrial relations reforms in the form of enterprise bargaining lay the seeds for Australia’s economic miracle – simultaneous high growth and low inflation.
With the passage of time and the benefit of hindsight, even Keating’s virulent adversaries are trying to claim the fruits of his hard work. Its record in government and its current policy outlining a commitment to infrastructure and supply-focussed spending demonstrate that Kevin Rudd and Labor really are the economic conservatives. After a decade of wasted opportunity, with the proceeds of a once-in-a-lifetime minerals boom squandered, Rudd should not make this campaign easy for Howard. Its time to go for the jugular.Sea of Love release The 81st Annual Academy Awards movie
Leave a Reply