Sunday, September 16th, 2007...12:07 am
Ross Gittins talks about economics
EcoSoc invited Ross Gittins to speak at an event at USyd on Thursday, where he presented a series of reasons on the topic of why neo-classical economics is flawed. He was quick to point out that he still fundamentally subscribes to neo-classical economics, but that it neglects (what he thinks are) important considerations. My immediate impression was that he’s a bit gruff and stubborn. When questioned about his ideas, he was adamant that he was right, and other considerations missed the point. However, that might have been because the tosser questioner used the word “epistemological”.
He made the interesting observation that economics split off from the “harder” sciences well before certain fundamentals had been established, and so what we have now is a discipline that is incestuously self-contained and unwilling to embrace outside ideas. On top of that, economists’ desire to be taken seriously has led them to “rigourise” their discipline by importing mathematical and econometric models. Gittins feels that these models are simply inadequate in accounting for the totality of human behaviour.
Gittins also attacked the central assumption in economics – that humans behave rationally. He pointed to people’s desire to balance work and life, giving gifts, conspicuous consumption, and an overriding “fairness” mechanism that all question the rationality assumption.
While Gittins’ criticisms of the economics profession are certainly valid, he seems to broadly ignore that many of his gripes are increasingly dealt with in behavioural and heterodox economics. His paternal father-knows-best criticism of people’s spending habits is not credible given the surprisingly stable level of income spent on consumption over the past 50 years. His grumble that there is too much physics and not enough psychology in economics has been taken up the orthodoxy.
All-in-all it was a pretty waffly talk. I amused myself by folding paper ties. Enoch was particularly bored.
3 Comments
September 16th, 2007 at 12:29 am
[…] Original post by Dan […]
September 16th, 2007 at 2:18 pm
Yeah, I expected more from him. I thought his talk was hardly enlightening. Another friend of mine thought it was a fantastic talk though and lambasted me for passing judgement on a person more knowledgeable than me in the field of economics.
September 18th, 2007 at 2:09 am
[…] Original post by Dan […]
Leave a Reply