Comments on: The Howard Myth http://www.kewpid.net/2007/08/10/the-howard-myth/ Dan the Student Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:32:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: kewpid.net » Blog Archive » The old union dinosaur ain’t what it used to be http://www.kewpid.net/2007/08/10/the-howard-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-6421 kewpid.net » Blog Archive » The old union dinosaur ain’t what it used to be Sat, 01 Sep 2007 04:09:29 +0000 http://www.kewpid.net/2007/08/10/the-howard-myth/#comment-6421 [...] trivialised people’s economic literacy, the “can’t manage the economy” argument [...] […] trivialised people’s economic literacy, the “can’t manage the economy” argument […]

]]> By: Dan http://www.kewpid.net/2007/08/10/the-howard-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-6237 Dan Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:48:14 +0000 http://www.kewpid.net/2007/08/10/the-howard-myth/#comment-6237 It is not strictly prohibited, but if the government goes about it the wrong way it would be struck down as in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_v_Bank_of_New_South_Wales" rel="nofollow">Bank nationalisation case</a>. It is not strictly prohibited, but if the government goes about it the wrong way it would be struck down as in the Bank nationalisation case.

]]> By: Vee http://www.kewpid.net/2007/08/10/the-howard-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-6225 Vee Sat, 11 Aug 2007 06:01:16 +0000 http://www.kewpid.net/2007/08/10/the-howard-myth/#comment-6225 Post of the day, mate! Post of the day, mate!

]]> By: Enoch Lau http://www.kewpid.net/2007/08/10/the-howard-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-6224 Enoch Lau Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:24:50 +0000 http://www.kewpid.net/2007/08/10/the-howard-myth/#comment-6224 Where in the constitution is the socialisation of production prohibited? Or is it another one of those implied restrictions? Everything seems ripe for a Labor victory, but there's always the possibility that things will sour: some union representatives doing/saying stupid things, a terrorism attack, etc. Where in the constitution is the socialisation of production prohibited? Or is it another one of those implied restrictions?

Everything seems ripe for a Labor victory, but there’s always the possibility that things will sour: some union representatives doing/saying stupid things, a terrorism attack, etc.

]]> By: Tommy Chen http://www.kewpid.net/2007/08/10/the-howard-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-6222 Tommy Chen Sat, 11 Aug 2007 00:43:44 +0000 http://www.kewpid.net/2007/08/10/the-howard-myth/#comment-6222 I, for one, sincerely hope all those who switched to Howard at the last election because of interest rates are regretting it now. But then, if one gets fooled by that rhetoric, one will probably get fooled by the "let's blame the States for original sin" argument too. I, for one, sincerely hope all those who switched to Howard at the last election because of interest rates are regretting it now. But then, if one gets fooled by that rhetoric, one will probably get fooled by the “let’s blame the States for original sin” argument too.

]]>