Tuesday, June 13th, 2006...4:47 pm
Dan's first book review
(or my second if you include this veritable rant)
Being the on-the-pulse political junkie that I am, I bought The Longest Decade by George Megalogenis. The book is split into 15 pastiches that Megalogenis (I’m gonna call him GM from now on) calls “snapshots”. You’d think that would be one snapshot for each year of the “decade”, but that would limit half of the Keating/Howard double-act to a third of the volume.
The writing itself is fairly easy to read — “pedestrian”, if you’re feeling bitchy — but that’s good because I have a curiously short attention span. It is more like 15 loosely connected feature articles than a unified tome. The oil that GM’s trying to sell is that despite the popular notion that Keating and Howard are a study in contrasts, they are fundamentally similar in their economic and foreign policy outlook. For example, while Keating is remembered for his fondness for greater relations with the Asian region, and Howard less so, the truth is they both saw the economic potential in Asia, and any push for cultural integration was nominal at best. Keating said in 1996, “I have never believed that Australians should describe themselves as Asians or that Australia is or can become part of Asia”. Howard has otherwise made that point abundantly clear.
Keating is lauded and lambasted for his economic reforms and high interest rates. Howard is strangely celebrated for keeping Australia’s rate of interest in the economy low. While economic concepts are sometimes obscure and difficult to explain, GM is doing readers a great disservice by adopting the Howard approach. Important issues that marked Australia’s transition to a relatively open economy such as the distribution of incomes and workforce participation are conflated to the vague descriptor “deregulation”. Keating, for all his flaws, increased the economic literacy of the nation, and explained his policy. Howard has been happy to let the people slowly slide into ignorance. GM as an economics graduate should know better.
Apart from the litany of typos and grammatical errors which were a little grating (and should have been picked up by the editors), The Longest Decade
is a decent summary of the Keating/Howard era. Though there is persuasive evidence to their similarities, its doubtful Keating and Howard will ever really get along.
7 Comments
June 13th, 2006 at 6:10 pm
Oooh, very interesting post. Thanks for that.
June 13th, 2006 at 11:49 pm
Not that I’m going to read it.
June 14th, 2006 at 10:49 am
Yes, I think it’s better for our sanity to stick with fiction.
June 14th, 2006 at 2:22 pm
I dunno: I had a phase there where all I read was non-fiction. I’m trying to overcome that now so I’m not such a boring person
June 15th, 2006 at 8:54 pm
mmm i haven’t read it, but i have to admit, it looked a bit sus the way The Oz kept repeatedly promoting it — and mentioning it other articles — continuously for several weeks.
the real irony is keating actually cared about the economy.. howard couldn’t give a stuff unless it gets him votes. unfortunately, economic literacy is still shocking (eg, any newspaper letters page) but the increased attention given to interest rates (media, borrowing) has made a lot of people think that interest rates cause economic progress, not the other way round. (There was even some clown that wrote “it matters little whether inflation is 3% or 6%, so the reserve shouldn’t raise interest rates and give people on mortgages a break”… thankfully, they (CT) printed my demolishment of it… but a lot of people seriously think that! it’s scary).
August 11th, 2007 at 2:40 am
[…] inasmuch as he acknowledged Hawke/Keating’s role in opening up Australia’s economy in The Longest Decade: He again acknowledged structural changes to the economy made by the Hawke and Keating governments, […]
August 9th, 2009 at 2:39 pm
[…] I have said before the Liberal party in Australia places very little currency in educating the Australian public about […]
Leave a Reply